这个词有两个意思,一个是雨伞,一个是庇护
你选哪个啊`

1
Hamlet is perhaps the most notoriously enigmatic character in all of Western literature: we want to like him, we want him to find peace, and yet there are always the facts that he callously destroys Ophelia without reason -- certainly, antagonizing Polonius's daughter does not fall under the umbrella of his "antic disposition" -- and that he remorselessly murders Polonius, and even later gratuitously orders the deaths of his former school-friends, Rosencrantz and Guildenstern. We therefore cannot connect with him in the same way that we connect with other tragic heroes like Brutus. But along the same lines, Hamlet is certainly no hero-villain: he is no Macbeth, for instance.
So how should we think about Hamlet? Perhaps the best advice is to give up trying to categorize him and instead just listen to him: he thinks so well that our own thinking can only improve from exposure to his. Many people fuss over Hamlet's inaction, his inability to follow through with his vengeance against Claudius, but the more you listen to Hamlet, the more you begin to realize that perhaps fulfilling his dead father's revenge-wish is not what he wants, and THAT is why he does not act. I firmly follow Nietzsche in his observation that Hamlet does not think too much, but rather thinks too well.
Like all of the Folger Library editions of Shakespeare, this text includes useful notes on every left-hand page and a reasonable consolidation of all versions of the play on every right-hand page. Thus, the book is ideal for any classroom- or individual-based study of Shakespeare's most engimatic personage. Highly recommended.
4
His interactions with the other characters in the play, and his ability know in advance the corrupt plans of so many of his enemies at Elsinore, demonstrate Hamlet's sensible thoughts that would not go through his mind had he gone mad. There are also considerable distinctions between the actions of Hamlet in his "mad" state of mind and the few other characters that undoubtedly lost sanity. Hamlet is a smart, scholarly man, and faking a mental disability could certainly a part of his plot to revenge his father's death, which was a command of his father. Hamlet gives a warning to Horatio and others that he might act strangely at times, which would put whatever "mad" tendencies other may he displays into perspective. He unmistakably informs his mother, the queen Gertrude, that she was not to reveal to Claudius that he was "not in madness, but mad in craft" (3:4:9). She is not convinced that her son is okay, however he is clear in his point. A mad man would certainly not care about the other's thoughts and opinions of him. Horatio would probably have notice if his friend was acting out of the ordinary without a reason, and brought it to someone's attention, had it been serious enough. The first time the king and queen become aware of his "madness" is when Polonius announces it to them and tells them of Hamlets love for his daughter, Ophelia. Your noble son is mad: Mad call I it; for, to define true madness, What is't but to be nothing else but mad? But let that go...At such a time I'll loose my daughter to him..."(2:2:99).
If any of Hamlet's 'madness' is based on his talk of ghosts, the accusation is a blunder. Hamlet did not do a bad thing by frightening his uncle, but it certainly did make an impact. Claudius's startled state after the player's performance is proof that Hamlet is correct in his accusations. The Ghost of his father was the one that informed Hamlet of this ill deed. If the spirit were simply a fabrication of his imagination, than there would be no explanation for Hamlet's knowledge of his father's murder. He was the one that instructed the players to put on the show; therefore he must have gotten the information about the characters from some source, namely his dead father. If the ghost were there in the beginning, what would keep him from checking on his son from time to time? Young Hamlet was asked to seek revenge on his uncle, and the ghost is depending on him to do that. The spirit would have no choice but to be frequently watching his son, to know that he intends to do the job. There is so much evidence the specter is not just in Hamlets mind, that it is certain that the Ghost can not be considered when deciding that Hamlet is insane. Most of the "trustworthy" characters in the play recognize the ghost. Hamlet informs Horatio and Marcellus (1:5:190) that he will "put an antic disposition on", and might mutter strange phrases and demonstrate other acts of insanity. There is no doubt that others think he is unwell, but it could just be a statement used to back up the idea of sending the prince away. Claudius is opposed to Hamlets presence from the beginning, but chooses to let him stay for his own purposes. Though Prince Hamlets insanity is the main focus of distress for most, other individuals are mad as well, and for the first time quite genuinely. When Ophelia is seen as mad for the first time (4:5:28) she is openly singing and chanting- things that Hamlet never did. He talks of Polonius as a "fishmonger", and often makes reference to other seemingly ridiculous things, which could, and do at times, have deeper meaning. He was generally just talking sharply about some of his enemies. The strange behavior is probably a way to distract Polonius, Claudius, and perhaps the Queen, while Hamlet seeks revenge for his lifeless father. The most suspicious aspect of the "madness" is that his moments of visible mental uneasiness go on and off. One moment he will be talking nonsense to the King and his advisor, and within minutes he is talking in a perfectly understandable tone to his old childhood friends.
He questions issues of humanity often, especially towards the close of the play, which would explain his hasty choice to fence with this dangerous rival, that is plotting to take away the only thing Hamlet has, his life. Much unlike a truly insane person Hamlet does not act spontaneously. There is never a significant doing on his part that was not well thought out in advance The "madness" that Hamlet portrays in the tragedy, though believed to be true my many, is false. It possibly allowed Hamlet more time to plot the revenge for his father's death by Claudius, or was just an example of the young prince's love of drama. Either way, their were many flaws in his "act" that go unnoticed by the other characters, but can be picked up on by the reader. Hamlets frequent switching from sanity to madness, are obvious clues that he is pretending. The ghost of his dead father, and the play that proved his existence outside of Hamlet's mind are convincing confirmation that he was not hallucinating. All the characters that used Hamlets "disability" as a tool could be merely forcing themselves to believe that Hamlet is mad. He could just be going along with their unfortunate thoughts to convince them he is mad. Shakespeare's Masterpiece, Hamlet draws in so many people because of these debatable arguments. The question of Hamlets madness is reasonable, and after re-reading all the textual evidence, one must lean towards the fact that Hamlet is sane, for whatever reasons he chooses. It is a marvelous plan on his part, and should be noted as such.

当人们真正想要努力去做了，上帝偏偏又开始吝啬了，反悔了，赖皮了。
　　不可否认，机遇是不等人的，它不是被动的，不会等着你去分析这，分析那，考虑这，考虑那等一系列琐碎的事件后，再决定去做。或许它本身就是个稍纵即逝的“精灵”，它考验的是我们的勇气与胆量，智慧与灵魂。但也不是说，所有的事都不应该经过深思熟虑，周密安妥的-

进行，如果是这样，那么我们与远古时代又有何分别？　　当然机遇也是需要珍惜的，需要好好利用的，碰到机遇已经是很“困难”的，要充分地彻底地去利用，却是“难上加难”。怎样去更好地“完善”它，是个重点。
　　那位警察，不是已经给了索比多次机会吗？而索比并没有为此去认识到什么，只是一味地无休止地不停地为着他心中所谓的“目标”继续扮演着生命的“小丑”，乐此不疲。而幸运的他，总在“舞台”上有写“失足”，但终究被当作“笑料”，一笑置之。
　　一场“戏剧”的结束，意味着另一场“戏剧”的开演。对警察而言，只是去例行公事；对读者而言，只是将近结尾；对生活而言，只是个小插曲；对编剧而言，是个不错的情节；对观众而言，只是对得起一张票；对索比而言，是对生命的新想法地靠近，是为他先前的“无知”付出的代价， 为他不懂的珍惜从他手中逃脱，也许可以扭转他命运的“机遇”而对其藐视所得到的教训的最终结果。
　　如果他会怪任何人，那么证明他的确活该；如果他只怪自己，那么他就能大声地对自己说：“三个月，也不算太久，我会珍惜并且把握住每一天的光阴。幸福，其实并没走远，只是我忽略了。等着吧……”
　　幸福，其实并没走远。没错，主宰幸福的有很多，机遇是其中的一个。不要等到上帝不耐烦了，毕竟他也有喜怒哀乐，给你个下马威，到那时，就好象太没“人情味”了。受苦的可是自己。
　　珍惜周遭的人或物，它们每天都在改变，只是我们太忙，没看见。机遇，就好比是遇到的机会，是件好事。好好把握，将它的好处发挥至极，则是一件“美”事。一个人的生命中会有形形色色的状况，每一个状况所具有的意义却是截然不同，大相径庭。选择不同的状况，就会有不同的人生，不同的命运，不同的变化……所以，我们要将机遇“透明化”，完全看清，这样，才不会误入歧途啦。
　　倘若相反，结局就会如同索比：惊恐地醒悟到自己已经坠入了深渊，堕落的岁月，可耻的欲念，悲观失望，才穷智竭，动机卑鄙。
　　机遇遇到却不把握，是蠢材；不遇机遇却懂得把握，是人才；既遇机遇又懂得把握，是天才。
当人们真正想要努力去做了，上帝偏偏又开始吝啬了，反悔了，赖皮了。
　　不可否认，机遇是不等人的，它不是被动的，不会等着你去分析这，分析那，考虑这，考虑那等一系列琐碎的事件后，再决定去做。或许它本身就是个稍纵即逝的“精灵”，它考验的是我们的勇气与胆量，智慧与灵魂。但也不是说，所有的事都不应该经过深思熟虑，周密安妥的-

进行，如果是这样，那么我们与远古时代又有何分别？　　当然机遇也是需要珍惜的，需要好好利用的，碰到机遇已经是很“困难”的，要充分地彻底地去利用，却是“难上加难”。怎样去更好地“完善”它，是个重点。
　　那位警察，不是已经给了索比多次机会吗？而索比并没有为此去认识到什么，只是一味地无休止地不停地为着他心中所谓的“目标”继续扮演着生命的“小丑”，乐此不疲。而幸运的他，总在“舞台”上有写“失足”，但终究被当作“笑料”，一笑置之。
　

警察与赞美诗，欧亨利经典小说
The Cop and the Anthem
The Cop and the Anthem is a very interesting short novel. It is written by O.Henry. In the story, a poor man named Soapy has no job or money. He wanted to go to the jail because he has nowhere to go. The food in the jail can feed him. He tried a lot to break the law so that the police would catch him and send him to the jail. He ate a great meal without paying the bill, he shouted in the street, he grabbed someone’s umbrella. But he failed, the people just didn’t call the police. He started to think. He thought it was the God’s idea to keep him out of jail. And just when he decided to find a job and live on his own, a police came and send him to jail.
Sometimes the life is like a joke, it is very interesting. Just like Forrest Gump once said “Life is like a box of chocolate, you never know what you are gonna get”. You never know what is gonna happen to you at the next second, So just try to enjoy your life.
通俗易懂