我以前写过汤姆索亚历险记的可以给你，有很多是借鉴网上的，写的不是很好请见谅
I was read the book which called “The Adventures of Tom Sawyer”. This story is about a clever boy called Tom Sawyer.
Tom is a naughty boy, he doesn’t like school and he doesn’t like work and he never wants to get up in the morning. But he like playing like swimming, fishing and having adventures with his friends. In this story he and his friend have a lot of adventures. These adventures can be dangerous. One night in the graveyard he and Huck see three men. Then Tom and his friends saw a murder. Joey killed the doctor and referred to Peter. Tom and his friends exposed Joey and caught him and became hero.
I think Tom is naughty but he is sympathetic and upright, he is brave he doesn’t afraid of Joey and full of his mind are wicked idea but he is clever and optimistic, he want his friend work for him, he make a lot of funny things.
This book let me know we need to “The road sees rough, gone to bat” to face difficult things we can’t shrink
back and we need to fight with them. In the same time l know if only have a dream have pursuit and should try our best to do it , we can’t give up easily .
It just like in our study life we need to do our best. When we have problem we need to overcome it and get better scores.

Shakspere (wrong spelling) created Hamlet--a man with wisdom and courage .In order to revenge on his uncle for killing his father, he pretented (spelling mistake) to be mad and suffered a series of misery. On the contrary, we can also say that Hamlet is rude and selfish for he did not think twice before his revenge . if (Capitalize "If" since it is the beginning word of the sentence.) a country has no king, how can a country keep alive (You need a question mark here since it is a question.) So, every thing has two sides, the bright side and adumbral side. Every time we make a decision we have to think twice.
Comment:
Be careful with your spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Too many uncessary mistakes.
It is good that you looked at both the dark and bright sides of Hamlet. Thats quite objective and convincing .
Hamlet " of Shakespear is a classical representative work. This book certainly does not have the big difference in the superficial plot with the historical fable, spoke or the Danish prince the story which revenged for the father, in which fills the rank smell of blood violence and dies.Just like the dramatis personae Horatio said: " you may hear to to rape massacre, the unusual repair behavior, the dark center decision, accidental slaughter, borrows the hand murder , as well as falls into suicide result." Windingly elects the plot, tightly centers on the revenge to launch. Hamlet Wittenberg hurries back the home in a hurry from Germany, is attends his father's funeral, enables him to accept, he not catches up with father's funeral, actually witnessed the mother and the Uncle Claudius' wedding ceremony, this had caused Hamm the Wright suspicion at the heart, added night above meets in the royal palace castle with father's ghost, the ghost sorrow sued, this pile atrocity was Uncle Hamlet the behavior, and wanted him to revenge for the father.To this, he started the difficult revenge course, launched the life and death contest with Claudius. Finally, sent out sword the revenge to Claudius
Hamlet is a man with contradictory,he had many chances to kill Claudius,but he hesitated,which reflects the religious thought poisons.

Book review of “Pride and Prejudice”
“Pride and Prejudice” was a famous work of Jane Austen. The story showed how various characters choose their marriage partners and the mistakes they make alone the way. Mrs. Bennet’s was urgent need to find good husbands for all her daughters. So when a rich unmarried young man rented a large house in the neighborhood. She was so excitement. She let her husband to visit the new neighbor. She was determined that Mr. Bingly should marry one of her girls. After Mr. Bennet's visit, Mr. Bingly also called on them. They had a party. At the party one of Mr. Bingly's friends who called also took park in them. He is a rich man. But he was so arrogant. He only danced with Bingly's sister. He looked upon Elizabeth. Through contact with each other, Darcy found that Elizabeth was so charming especially her big eyes. They met each other at another party. He invited her to have a dance this time. He was refused. Her refusal had not harmed her in the gentleman’s opinion, and he thought of her with some admiration. Elizabeth’s two sisters were just like their mother. They went to their aunt’s home every week in order to meet the officers on their way there. Once Elizabeth met a stranger who named Wickham on their way. At the same time, they met Darcy and Bingly Elizabeth happened to see the faces of both when they looked at each other. The face of one became white, the other turned red. Elizabeth felt quit strange. Elizabeth had stronger prejudice on Darcy Later Bingly hold a party. Mr. Collins made a proposal to Elizabeth. She refused. It made Mrs. Bennet very angry. However, Mr. Bennet quite supported his daughter. No sooner Mr. Collin married another girl. After Christmas Jane went to London visit her uncle. Vickham continue

《飘》的爱情永不随风飘
我觉得《飘》的最大魅力在于深刻描述了男女之间因为情感的错位而产生的一种扣人心弦、揪心抓狂式的感受。每每男女主人公一而再再而三地错过彼此的那种情景出现就特别想骂他们傻，其中最令人心里堵着的地方就是小说的结尾，一方幡然醒悟，而另一方却去意已决。也许每个看到这里的人都会产生这样的想法：要懂得珍惜真正爱你的人。而这恰恰最能够直抵自己对待情感的态度和状况。每一个人都渴望爱情，你爱着一个人，你是多么的希望他/她懂得珍惜，对不对？另外一个人在爱着你，他/她同样也希望你懂得珍惜，难道不是吗？如果你和对方的爱出现了错位，那么作为第一种情形，你会向他/她推荐，看一下《飘》，甚至还特别想把最后那个章节翻给他/她看：珍惜我吧，再不珍惜，我可要走了哦
如果是第二种情形，他/她就会向你推荐，看一下《Gone with the wind》，而且也是多么想把最后那个章节翻给你看。因此，在我看来，天底下的爱情就可以归结为N个错位的情爱交流，只有真正找到彼此相爱的人的时候，才能够使得双方的位置准确而且才能奏出美妙的爱情之歌。
那么，什么才是真正的彼此相爱的人、真正值得厮守一生的人呢？并不是所有你爱的人，也并不是所有爱你的人都值得真正的珍惜并与之结合。爱斯佳丽的人何其多啊？但是真正值得她依靠和相守的却只有瑞特一个，但她却不那么懂得珍惜，而斯佳丽一直爱着的、眷恋着的那个阿希里却并不适合她。于是，我们遇到几乎人人都会有的困境：面对我爱的人和爱我的人，我们该怎么选择呢？
有这么一句话：聪明的女人会嫁给爱她的男人，而愚蠢的女人才会嫁给她爱的男人。在理论上，这是非常经典的判断。而事实，在恋爱里，没有谁是聪明的，其实全都是傻瓜。在爱情里，只有运气好的傻瓜和运气糟糕的笨蛋而已。一个傻瓜爱上了一个笨蛋，却居然发现这个笨蛋也是爱着自己，这简直是可遇不可求的一对——笨蛋配傻瓜，当然他们是幸福的。
而在《飘》里，像瑞特这样在爱情上表现得极端聪明游刃有余的成熟男人，换一个角度看，他其实是个大笨蛋（斯佳丽就更不用说了），为了这么一个女人真心付出但是一直都没有能获得她内心多年来像对待阿希里一样的爱。但是面对爱情，我们还能说什么呢？爱情的奥秘，只可意会不可言传。每个人，只要你用心经营，同样会有一曲自己的爱情之歌，希望它少些哀怨和忧愁，多一些欢乐与幸福。
恢弘悲壮的南北战争都只是成了爱情故事的大背景而已，其中令人荡气回肠、哀怨曲折的爱情啊~并不会随着老南方的远去而GONE WITH THE WIND~
前不久刚看好了<飘>,好不容易从图书馆抢来的,因为一个版本只有一套,害我老是图书馆门没开就去排队了,嘿嘿,足见还是挺不错的一本书.
总的来说么,看<飘>就好象是看电影一样,很是能吊人胃口.听说<乱事佳人>好象是根据飘改编而来,那我也要好好的补上这一空白了.想必也是直得一看的电影.在＜飘＞中，我记忆中似乎是好象全部的人都垮了，最后只剩思嘉了．在书中我所喜爱的人中还剩这么根独苗，还是有点安慰啊．．．
可是我一遍读下来就很难有兴趣再次去读第二遍了．不象是＜傲慢与偏见＞那样我已经读了好几遍了，两者都是以情节取胜的．何以有如此不同呐．最大的不同是前者似乎是以悲剧结束的，＜傲慢于偏见＞则是用大喜剧收笔的，让人总的感来还是皆大欢喜．而在＜飘＞中一个个鲜活的人物一个个从笔下消失，有喜欢的有不喜欢的，让人有一种渐渐冷漠的感觉．思嘉花了那么多的努力到头来还是一场空，失去了好多：青春的幻想，亲朋好友的拥抱，但最后还是保住了心灵中最后的支柱．给人的感觉好象是泰戈尔所写的：人们默默的承受着悲痛，但还是坚持着自己的事业，个人的感情如同暗流那样在我们看不到的地方默默的流淌着.当我们观察各个工作领域时，我们看见有人在做生意，有人在梨田，有人在搬运重物；而在这一切之下，死亡，悲痛与损失，就好象看不见的潜流，每天都在奔流着，＿＿＿清清静静，从未被人打扰过．如果这些东西打破控制，变得表面化，那么所有这些工作都会立即停顿下来．个人的悲痛在下面奔流，上面是一条坚实的石路，职责的列车载负着人类，隆隆地响着飞驰而过，除了在指定的车站以外，不为任何人停下．也许，事业的这种残酷性，到头来竟会是对人的最冷峻的安慰．我人为这是对＜飘＞的最好的诠释了，塔拉，一切都是为了塔拉，到最后塔拉还是成了思嘉最后的安慰，最冷峻的安慰.书中最后的结尾还是写到思嘉终于回到往昔塔拉，寻求安慰和勇气．
我无法在写下去了，那种是不可名状的，在没有人发明那个词字之前，我选择把它埋在心底．把希望放在明天，从明天寻求安慰的思嘉，注定站到了最后，最后的孤独女英雄．

求一篇有关外国名著的读后感，字数在4千字左右，需分析为！
飘》的爱情永不随风飘
我觉得《飘》的最大魅力在于深刻描述了男女之间因为情感的错位而产生的一种扣人心弦、揪心抓狂式的感受。每每男女主人公一而再再而三地错过彼此的那种情景出现就特别想骂他们傻，其中最令人心里堵着的地方就是小说的结尾，一方幡然醒悟，而另一方却去意已决。也许每个看到这里的人都会产生这样的想法：要懂得珍惜真正爱你的人。而这恰恰最能够直抵自己对待情感的态度和状况。每一个人都渴望爱情，你爱着一个人，你是多么的希望他/她懂得珍惜，对不对？另外一个人在爱着你，他/她同样也希望你懂得珍惜，难道不是吗？如果你和对方的爱出现了错位，那么作为第一种情形，你会向他/她推荐，看一下《飘》，甚至还特别想把最后那个章节翻给他/她看：珍惜我吧，再不珍惜，我可要走了哦
如果是第二种情形，他/她就会向你推荐，看一下《Gone with the wind》，而且也是多么想把最后那个章节翻给你看。因此，在我看来，天底下的爱情就可以归结为N个错位的情爱交流，只有真正找到彼此相爱的人的时候，才能够使得双方的位置准确而且才能奏出美妙的爱情之歌。
那么，什么才是真正的彼此相爱的人、真正值得厮守一生的人呢？并不是所有你爱的人，也并不是所有爱你的人都值得真正的珍惜并与之结合。爱斯佳丽的人何其多啊？但是真正值得她依靠和相守的却只有瑞特一个，但她却不那么懂得珍惜，而斯佳丽一直爱着的、眷恋着的那个阿希里却并不适合她。于是，我们遇到几乎人人都会有的困境：面对我爱的人和爱我的人，我们该怎么选择呢？
有这么一句话：聪明的女人会嫁给爱她的男人，而愚蠢的女人才会嫁给她爱的男人。在理论上，这是非常经典的判断。而事实，在恋爱里，没有谁是聪明的，其实全都是傻瓜。在爱情里，只有运气好的傻瓜和运气糟糕的笨蛋而已。一个傻瓜爱上了一个笨蛋，却居然发现这个笨蛋也是爱着自己，这简直是可遇不可求的一对——笨蛋配傻瓜，当然他们是幸福的。
而在《飘》里，像瑞特这样在爱情上表现得极端聪明游刃有余的成熟男人，换一个角度看，他其实是个大笨蛋（斯佳丽就更不用说了），为了这么一个女人真心付出但是一直都没有能获得她内心多年来像对待阿希里一样的爱。但是面对爱情，我们还能说什么呢？爱情的奥秘，只可意会不可言传。每个人，只要你用心经营，同样会有一曲自己的爱情之歌，希望它少些哀怨和忧愁，多一些欢乐与幸福。
恢弘悲壮的南北战争都只是成了爱情故事的大背景而已，其中令人荡气回肠、哀怨曲折的爱情啊~并不会随着老南方的远去而GONE WITH THE WIND~
前不久刚看好了飘>,好不容易从图书馆抢来的,因为一个版本只有一套,害我老是图书馆门没开就去排队了,嘿嘿,足见还是挺不错的一本书.
总的来说么,看飘>就好象是看电影一样,很是能吊人胃口.听说乱事佳人>好象是根据飘改编而来,那我也要好好的补上这一空白了.想必也是直得一看的电影.在＜飘＞中，我记忆中似乎是好象全部的人都垮了，最后只剩思嘉了．在书中我所喜爱的人中还剩这么根独苗，还是有点安慰啊．．．
可是我一遍读下来就很难有兴趣再次去读第二遍了．不象是＜傲慢与偏见＞那样我已经读了好几遍了，两者都是以情节取胜的．何以有如此不同呐．最大的不同是前者似乎是以悲剧结束的，＜傲慢于偏见＞则是用大喜剧收笔的，让人总的感来还是皆大欢喜．而在＜飘＞中一个个鲜活的人物一个个从笔下消失，有喜欢的有不喜欢的，让人有一种渐渐冷漠的感觉．思嘉花了那么多的努力到头来还是一场空，失去了好多：青春的幻想，亲朋好友的拥抱，但最后还是保住了心......汗马绝尘安外振中标青史 锦羊开泰富民清政展新篇 春满人间